Forteo....For any medical types

We are the Borg.
User avatar
Vic Daring
Posts: 3006
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: Anvilania

Forteo....For any medical types

Post by Vic Daring » Fri Jun 11, 2004 4:52 pm

As you might guess by my avatar, I'm a pretty big Oakland A's fan.

Recently, the A's gold-glove third baseman Eric Chavez broke a bone in his hand after being hit by a pitch.

Apparently, the A's medical staff, are using Forteo as a supplement to the usual treatment and rehab routine.

A little research on my part shows that Forteo is a drug designed to stimulate bone growth. But, it's only approved by the FDA to treat those at risk for osteoperosis-related fractures, particualy post menopausal women.

Some Forteo Stuff

Some Forteo controversy

There's no mention of it being intended for the purpose the A's are using it for, which is to hopefully speed the healing process in Chavez' broken hand.

Is this as risky and reckless as it seems on its face? I mean, I can see the human clinical studies show no cancer incidence, but they are apparently only studied 2 years out.

Thoughts? Input? Anything?
Victim of the SBN (Search Button Nazis)

User avatar
Cloverlief
Posts: 5025
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:59 pm
Location: Here, there or somewhere

Post by Cloverlief » Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:27 pm

As it is approved for treatment of bone fractures albeit in a restricted group, it probably won't cause any more problems for your baseball player than for a menopausal woman outside of the stated side-effects. At best, it may be useless, but useless treatments are not uncommon as a placebo effect or a doctor stretching beyond medical protocols in hopes of finding the magic bullet, so to speak.

Working in industrial insurance, we don't approve any treatments that haven't been FDA approved for the body part being treated, but that has more to do with whether the treatment will be of actual benefit rather than harm.
Chani

User avatar
MRC_Hans
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by MRC_Hans » Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:33 pm

There was a survey some time ago, I wonder if anybody has a reference for it. They asked a number of athletes that if there was a drug that was:

1) Guaranteed to be undetectable.

2) Guaranteed to ensure them an Olympic medal.

3) Guaranteed to shorten their life several decades.

-- would they then use it. A frightingly large proportion answered yes. Of course, the fact that it was a hypothetical question might have influenced some of the answers, but when you see what athletes actually do risk to win.......
[i]Fly pretty, anyone can fly safe...[/i]