Amusing Science

We are the Borg.
User avatar
Witness
Posts: 33018
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: Amusing Science

Post by Witness »

Bruce wrote: Wed Dec 30, 2020 4:58 am Eventually, they will all have their periods at the same time. :D
You're referring to this myth, I presume: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menstrual_synchrony. :mrgreen:





Some points on phylogeny, the difficulties with microbes, and nice pics (skip the blather till 0:20 and after 9:20):

User avatar
Anaxagoras
Posts: 28894
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan

Re: Amusing Science

Post by Anaxagoras »

A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare
User avatar
Witness
Posts: 33018
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: Amusing Science

Post by Witness »

User avatar
ed
Posts: 40088
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:52 pm
Title: G_D

Re: Amusing Science

Post by ed »

[quote=Witness post_id=1049974 time=1609380554
[/quote]

I wondered about that. The methodology issue seems real. They did not seem to stratify on the basis of age or sexual activity or travel or a host of other things. All in all it the sloppy research that you would expect from a bunch of chicks.

Sad.
This space for let
User avatar
Anaxagoras
Posts: 28894
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan

Re: Amusing Science

Post by Anaxagoras »



As you know, radar uses radio waves, which are much longer in wavelength than visible light. The advantage of this is that it works well at night and can see through clouds, which optical telescopes can't do. The disadvantage is lower resolution, but they have a lot of neat tricks to improve the effective resolution.
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare
User avatar
Anaxagoras
Posts: 28894
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan

Re: Amusing Science

Post by Anaxagoras »

A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare
User avatar
Witness
Posts: 33018
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: Amusing Science

Post by Witness »

User avatar
robinson
Posts: 12239
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Pretty much dead already
Location: USA

Re: Amusing Science

Post by robinson »

still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
User avatar
Witness
Posts: 33018
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: Amusing Science

Post by Witness »

User avatar
Witness
Posts: 33018
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: Amusing Science

Post by Witness »

Nuke your favorite place (something for sparks :twisted: ): https://outrider.org/nuclear-weapons/in ... g=2.320582
User avatar
Witness
Posts: 33018
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: Amusing Science

Post by Witness »

New Study: Militarizing the Police Doesn’t Reduce Crime

A federal program created by Congress more than 30 years ago transferred 80,000 rifles, 12,000 bayonets, 4,000 combat knives, nearly 500 ‘bomb detonator robots,’ 50 airplanes, ‘night-vision sniper scopes,’ and more to local police.

Most Americans are probably unaware that police departments across the country have access to grenade launchers, drones, armored vehicles, and other military-grade equipment. But they do, thanks to an obscure federal policy allowing the military to transfer surplus equipment to law enforcement.

New research casts doubt on the principal justification for this program: police safety and crime reduction. Meanwhile, critics say it makes police abuse more likely.

The policy itself is known as the “1033 Program.” First created by Congress more than 30 years ago, it allowed for the transfer of military equipment to the police for use in the War on Drugs. Eventually, lawmakers expanded the policy to encompass essentially all law enforcement purposes.

According to the Department of Defense, roughly 8,200 law enforcement agencies across the country participate in the program. In total, the military has transferred more than $7.4 billion worth of equipment to local police departments.

...

In sum, there’s no disputing the fact that our policies have militarized the police. The only debate is whether giving police officers, who undoubtedly have a dangerous job, military equipment actually improves public safety as proponents insist.

A new peer-reviewed study concludes this just isn’t so.

Researchers from Louisiana State University and Emory University examined data from the 1033 Program’s record and found no evidence that it reduced crime in any meaningful way. It debunks past studies that purported to show such an effect and explains why those data were faulty.

“The most important thing for policy makers and the public to know is that you can’t justify giving surplus military equipment to police departments on the grounds it will lead to a reduction in crime,” Emory Professor Tom Clark said. “There is no evidence for that.”

Not only is there ample evidence that this kind of equipment fails to protect public safety, there’s further proof that it fails to protect police officers. According to a study of 9,000 law enforcement agencies in the US, this equipment has had no bearing on the number of officers killed or harmed in the line of duty.

Most concerning of all, other evidence shows that the militarization of police has led to worsening relationships between citizens and officers. It has caused a change in the mentality of how police view the citizens they serve and led to an increased use of weapons of war against Americans.
https://fee.org/articles/new-study-mili ... uce-crime/
User avatar
Anaxagoras
Posts: 28894
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan

Re: Amusing Science

Post by Anaxagoras »

A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare
User avatar
Witness
Posts: 33018
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: Amusing Science

Post by Witness »

Image
User avatar
Witness
Posts: 33018
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: Amusing Science

Post by Witness »

Image