Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

We are the Borg.
User avatar
robinson
Posts: 11386
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Pretty much dead already
Location: USA

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by robinson »

still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
User avatar
robinson
Posts: 11386
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Pretty much dead already
Location: USA

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by robinson »

The simplest thing involving weather, which leads to climate, might be snow

Sure, rain, wind, sunshine hours, clouds and temperature also seem simple, but snow has a special place in climate.

Ice forming on bodies of water might be even simpler, but much harder to measure, and way less data

Snow on the other hand, has a multitude of information, and there is a lot more of it to study
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
User avatar
robinson
Posts: 11386
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Pretty much dead already
Location: USA

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by robinson »

Frost, freezes, and hard freezes also tell us a lot about climate. Because of agriculture and the laws of physics, they are like snow, pretty hard for any current global warming expert to impeach.

(Not that they don’t try)

I know, I know, boring as fuck. There isn’t much to be done about this

It’s the goddamn weather, most people don’t farm and unless you ski/snowboard, most people just have other shit to think about
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
User avatar
robinson
Posts: 11386
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Pretty much dead already
Location: USA

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by robinson »

The defining moment for me, was simply watching the weather report in DC after the second blizzard shut everything down in the US capital

And I mean everything was shut down

The US post office was shut down for the first time in history

Of course the two news anchors were looking forward to the weather guy when he started his report

He was sitting at the news desk with them

Outside everything was quiet, not a single vehicle was moving, and a snow blower wasn’t going to work on the four feet of snow

Some places had more, some less, but it was a fuckton of snow

It was more snow than almost anyone had ever experienced

So when he told the world “but it wasn’t even a record breaker”, the anchors heads swiveled, there jaws dropped, everything went off script for a moment

The anchors actually interrupted him! An unplanned moment, it was fucking epic

He stammered and explained quickly that the snow records have to come from somewhere and that Reagan National is where they measure the official snow measurements are and blah blah blah

The anchors composed themselves and let it drop

But any rational person could see this was some seriously fucked up bullshit going down


Now of course there is more to the story

It was an unheard of back to back blizzards, with heavy bands of snow from the second one, so the snow depth varied

And the second on fell on top of the 2 to 3 feet of powder from the first one, and the second blizzard was wet snow, not powder, but the ordinary person knew what was outside, and nobody was going to buy that there was no record being broke

And this sad fucking little story started my long descent into madness

The truth was out there, and I had to know
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
User avatar
robinson2
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun May 17, 2020 4:02 pm
Title: I can’t be worrying about that

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by robinson2 »

Dude, nobody cares. I mean, you created me, and even I don't care
"This aggression will not stand, man."
User avatar
robinson
Posts: 11386
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Pretty much dead already
Location: USA

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by robinson »

You are under the delusion that I don't know this.
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
User avatar
Surprise
Posts: 1689
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 10:33 am
Title: Nostradamus

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by Surprise »

Has there been global cooling over the last 30 years?

No.

https://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/wti/from:1990/to:2020
"Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind."
User avatar
Surprise
Posts: 1689
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 10:33 am
Title: Nostradamus

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by Surprise »

Way to kill a thread.
"Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind."
User avatar
Abdul Alhazred
Posts: 87267
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:33 pm
Title: Yes, that one.
Location: Not quite Chicago

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by Abdul Alhazred »

23 pages is a pretty good run for a thread that was dead on arrival.

so robinson wins, but it kind of doesn't count because it's 100% his game from OP forward.

And it will never die as long as electrons flow through robinson's "brain". :)
Image "If I turn in a sicko, will I get a reward?"

"Yes! A BIG REWARD!" ====> Click here to turn in a sicko
The arc of the moral universe bends towards chaos.
People who believe God or History are on their side provide the chaos.
User avatar
robinson
Posts: 11386
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Pretty much dead already
Location: USA

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by robinson »

Been too busy

I thought the lockdown would mean a shit ton of time at home

Turned out meant even more money and work


Don’t worry, graphs and science and shit will come
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
User avatar
robinson2
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun May 17, 2020 4:02 pm
Title: I can’t be worrying about that

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by robinson2 »

He's not kidding. You can't imagine how many graphs and science shit he has on multiple computers. He's a freak
"This aggression will not stand, man."
User avatar
robinson
Posts: 11386
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Pretty much dead already
Location: USA

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by robinson »

Don’t forget the snowfall data
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
User avatar
gnome
Posts: 24839
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 12:40 am
Location: New Port Richey, FL

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by gnome »

Abdul Alhazred wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2020 1:58 pm 23 pages is a pretty good run for a thread that was dead on arrival.

so robinson wins, but it kind of doesn't count because it's 100% his game from OP forward.

And it will never die as long as electrons flow through robinson's "brain". :)
"Win" by exhaustion. Not an actual evidence based result.
"If fighting is sure to result in victory, then you must fight! Sun Tzu said that, and I'd say he knows a little bit more about fighting than you do, pal, because he invented it, and then he perfected it so that no living man could best him in the ring of honor. Then, he used his fight money to buy two of every animal on earth, and then he herded them onto a boat, and then he beat the crap out of every single one. And from that day forward any time a bunch of animals are together in one place it's called a zoo! (Beat) Unless it's a farm!"
--Soldier, TF2
User avatar
robinson
Posts: 11386
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Pretty much dead already
Location: USA

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by robinson »

I haven’t even really started
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
User avatar
robinson
Posts: 11386
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Pretty much dead already
Location: USA

Re: Climate Change/Global warming with graphs and science shit thrown in

Post by robinson »

ed wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:36 pm I am contentious by nature.

I need the moral equivilent of double blind, peer reviewed and replicated. If not its bullshit .

"Considered" is a weasel word that has no place in my lexicon.
I agree with you. Something I found early in was a serious lack of the scientific method when it comes to the BGWT


And related matters


It bothered me
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
User avatar
robinson
Posts: 11386
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Pretty much dead already
Location: USA

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by robinson »

A real theory makes predictions, and is clear about what experiments or observations of reality would support or destroy the theory
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
User avatar
robinson
Posts: 11386
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Pretty much dead already
Location: USA

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by robinson »

It’s interesting (to me of course) that the BGWT was destroyed three times, but is once again on the table
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
User avatar
sparks
Posts: 16954
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Friar McWallclocks Bar -- Where time stands still while you lean over!

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by sparks »

What is this horseshit BGWT of which you speak? I just searched it up and even Googly didn't know...Therefore methinks you're, once again, full of shit.

Please prove me wrong.
You can lead them to knowledge, but you can't make them think.
User avatar
robinson
Posts: 11386
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Pretty much dead already
Location: USA

Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!

Post by robinson »

Surprise wrote: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:14 am
robinson wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2020 12:19 pm Probably the same reason why the actual data for temperature is so hard to get
It's not hard to get. It's publicly available and you can download all you want. Knock yourself out.

The BEST project was intended to prove the science wrong and the temperature statistics false. In the end it had to conclude the scientists were right and the 'skeptics' were wrong.
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
User avatar
robinson
Posts: 11386
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Pretty much dead already
Location: USA

Re: Climate Change/Global warming with graphs and science shit thrown in

Post by robinson »

It’s hard jumping into long topic with terminology and shit like that, I understand. I explained early on, but of course you missed it.


Scientist are really annoying because they abbreviate shit, which saves a lot of time, but fucking hell if you don’t know what they are saying
robinson wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 12:54 am Putting these to rest
A) Doubt that a warming trend is occurring at all.

The question is not exact enough for an answer.

B)Agree that there is a warming trend but doubt that it is significantly driven by human activity

Can’t be answered for same reason

C)Agree that there is a warming trend that is significantly driven by human activity, but that we are choosing the wrong solutions.

Can’t be answered same reason.

“A warming trend” is not scientific. My skepticism is specific, about many things being claimed, based on the basic global warming theory. BGWT

Claims about the BGWT, using computer models, and even old fashioned calculations, were the first thing I looked at.

In the ten years since that epic winter, a lot more data has been gathered. One thing that BGWT definitely predicts (not a projection) is the most warming will be observed in winter, with the most warming happening over land, at extra tropical latitudes, and high elevations. And at night.

This is simple to explain. CO2 caused warming (carbon) is supposed to be happening where water vapor (WV) isn’t overwhelming any carbon effect. WV usually dominates any carbon heating, the original objection to the BGWT

Plass and others brought the theory back showing a carbon effect at high altitudes, where the dry air is free from WV, and this led to calculations and the BGWT coming back as the main driver of climate change (explaining the ice ages)

So while the ice ages were once again explained by the BGWT, a water vapor feedback was added to try and explain some of the unsolved parts of the theory.

The biggest problem was, and still is, how can an ice age start the glacier building phase when carbon is at the peak levels? Just because the AGW theory replaced BGWT as the dominating factor, did not make this huge problem go away.

If you are objecting already to these statements, which is most often the case, you may get be in over your head already.
Have you ever run across BP, or RCYBP? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Before_Present
It’s like there is this barrier so if you are not in the club, good luck keeping up
Last edited by robinson on Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris