I can’t tell if the hot rub bot is dissing NOAA, GISS and the GHCN graphs or not
Like most troll bots, it’s just general snark with nothing solid at all
Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!
-
- Posts: 12648
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
- Title: Pretty much dead already
- Location: USA
Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
-
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2020 4:02 pm
- Title: I can’t be worrying about that
Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!
It's called a program. No AI required for data processing.Abdul Alhazred wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 1:46 pm Making graphs, any graphs really, is the perfect task for a 'bot. Just feed in any old data, get a graph.
"This aggression will not stand, man."
-
- Posts: 12648
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
- Title: Pretty much dead already
- Location: USA
Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!
Wolfram alpha is sort of like that. It used AI to generate graphs and graphic displays from public domain data.Abdul Alhazred wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 1:46 pm Making graphs, any graphs really, is the perfect task for a 'bot. Just feed in any old data, get a graph.
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
-
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2020 4:02 pm
- Title: I can’t be worrying about that
Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!
Funny you should go there. I was just cross checking wolframalpha data displays with my own plots
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=t ... ronwood+il
Ironwood data almost matches the GHCN data
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=t ... ronwood+il
Ironwood data almost matches the GHCN data
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"This aggression will not stand, man."
-
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2020 4:02 pm
- Title: I can’t be worrying about that
Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!
But it's just the airport data, which is why it starts in 1974
The GHCN data shows the long term trend
The GHCN data shows the long term trend
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"This aggression will not stand, man."
-
- Posts: 12648
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
- Title: Pretty much dead already
- Location: USA
Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!
That is kind of cool actually
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
-
- Posts: 12648
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
- Title: Pretty much dead already
- Location: USA
Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!
The global alarmists have been selling the global warming story so hard, and so long now, it's possible to simply used the data from the time period of alarmists, to show why they have been wrong, and not just slightly wrong, completely wrong.
Of course this will not matter, not even a little, not even in a microscopic sense. As a matter of fact, the data will be claimed to actually support the alarmists bullshit story. I know that sounds like a ridiculous claim. (it actually is ridiculous)
But it is what happens, and frankly I am no longer surprised at all. In fact, I expect it, I predict it.
So, on with the show.
Here is last years graph from Rurgers snow lab
https://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/c ... i_month=10

And here is this years

The astute observer might note they had to change the graphic, for the scale was too small now. 2 million square kilometers wasn't enough to show the extent. They had to raise the bar. Literally.
The amount of snow for NA in October increased that much.
Of course this will not matter, not even a little, not even in a microscopic sense. As a matter of fact, the data will be claimed to actually support the alarmists bullshit story. I know that sounds like a ridiculous claim. (it actually is ridiculous)
But it is what happens, and frankly I am no longer surprised at all. In fact, I expect it, I predict it.
So, on with the show.
Here is last years graph from Rurgers snow lab
https://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/c ... i_month=10
And here is this years
The astute observer might note they had to change the graphic, for the scale was too small now. 2 million square kilometers wasn't enough to show the extent. They had to raise the bar. Literally.
The amount of snow for NA in October increased that much.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
-
- Posts: 12648
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
- Title: Pretty much dead already
- Location: USA
Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!
In 2007, and even 2008, the October snow extent was considered a downward trend, the reduction in snow cover was exactly what models and theory predicted. As it warms snow cover is reduced.
It should look like this
https://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/c ... ui_month=6
Which of course is what we expect when it is warmer. Less snow falls, (more rain instead), and snow cover melts, and is melted by the rain. A reduction in snow cover is 100% evidence, it is an absolute indicator of climate, and climate change.
What happened when snow cover started increasing instead?
For example, 1988-2020?
https://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/c ... i_month=10
Now snow cover is also (maybe) a sign of global warming. No, that is not a joke. Trust me. In fact, remember my prediction early on?
Yes, we will see a post in no time, in this topic, explaining how global warming is causing more snow. If they skipped reading, it will be really funny. If they read this and still post such a thing, ah, that would be perfect.
I would take the time to create images from the Rutgers data, (you can't link to their images) but it would be quite simply, a waste of time.
Here a couple of old graphs showing the declining trend for snow cover, which of course was evidence of global warming.
It should look like this
https://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/c ... ui_month=6
Which of course is what we expect when it is warmer. Less snow falls, (more rain instead), and snow cover melts, and is melted by the rain. A reduction in snow cover is 100% evidence, it is an absolute indicator of climate, and climate change.
What happened when snow cover started increasing instead?
For example, 1988-2020?
https://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/c ... i_month=10
Now snow cover is also (maybe) a sign of global warming. No, that is not a joke. Trust me. In fact, remember my prediction early on?
Yes, we will see a post in no time, in this topic, explaining how global warming is causing more snow. If they skipped reading, it will be really funny. If they read this and still post such a thing, ah, that would be perfect.
I would take the time to create images from the Rutgers data, (you can't link to their images) but it would be quite simply, a waste of time.
Here a couple of old graphs showing the declining trend for snow cover, which of course was evidence of global warming.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris
-
- Posts: 12648
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
- Title: Pretty much dead already
- Location: USA
Re: Climate Change/Global Warming Hysteria with graphs!
And here is what it looks like now
https://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/c ... i_season=4
https://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/c ... i_season=1
The alarmists has no problem when faced with reality bitch slapping them in the face. They just adjust the story. And go on as if nothing actually happened.
In fact, they might get mad at anyone with the balls to point out they are wrong.
https://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/c ... i_season=4
https://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/c ... i_season=1
The alarmists has no problem when faced with reality bitch slapping them in the face. They just adjust the story. And go on as if nothing actually happened.
In fact, they might get mad at anyone with the balls to point out they are wrong.
still working on Sophrosyne, but I will no doubt end up with Hubris