Not the way I see it. Let me break it down to a little bit absurd but I hope it makes the point:ed wrote:Thisgnome wrote:What a bullshit question. There is no reason pluralism cannot coexist with consistently enforced laws against violence. What the hell.Abdul Alhazred wrote:Not really on topic, and not even about the UK, but somehow this oped in The New York Times seems relevant.
The German Feminists’ Dilemma
By Anna Sauerbrey
Ms. Sauerbrey is an editor at the newspaper Der Tagesspiegel.
...
The cases {unequivocal nasty ones previously noted in the article} have added fuel to the far right’s fiery anti-immigrant rhetoric. And it has created a dilemma for Germany’s liberal feminists: How can they fight against violence without supporting anti-immigrant resentments? Or to put it even more bluntly: Is it even possible to defend pluralism and women’s rights at the same time in Germany today?
Violence against women committed by immigrant men first became a topic of debate after hundreds of women were sexually harassed and abused by groups of young men, most of whom were immigrants from North African countries, at Cologne’s main train station on New Year’s Eve in 2015. Since then there has been a steady drumbeat of stories, ranging from harassment in the streets to rape and murder, across Germany.
...is an explicit admission that immigrants are the problem.How can they fight against violence without supporting anti-immigrant resentments
Proposal: "A lot of criminals are immigrants. Let's not let any immigrants in."
(opposition ensues)
Proposal: "Fine, let them do whatever they want. Wouldn't want to appear racist!"
(opposition ensues)
Proposal: "I can't win! There's no other options! Peaceful pluralism is impossible!"