Lakers vs. Celtics

Grammatron · Post by **Grammatron** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:20 pm

Calling it now.

izittrue · Post by **izittrue** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:42 pm

But who wins in the end?
What about New Orleans?
And I have to root for my home state team

Grammatron · Post by **Grammatron** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:44 pm

izittrue wrote:But who wins in the end?

Lakers. Sorry to make Doc cry.

What about New Orleans?

What about them?

And I have to root for my home state team

Sorry.

izittrue · Post by **izittrue** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:46 pm

Meanie...add emoticon of your choice here.
I will stick with PHX..and then get on somebody else's bandwagon if they should lose...

Evolver · Post by **Evolver** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:54 pm

Grammatron wrote: Lakers. Sorry to make Doc cry.

Doubt it. Celtics fed the over-rated Kobe his lunch.
And without Shaq being able to camp out in the paint, the Lakers won't win a title.

Grammatron · Post by **Grammatron** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:03 pm

Evolver wrote:
Grammatron wrote: Lakers. Sorry to make Doc cry.
Doubt it. Celtics fed the over-rated Kobe his lunch.
And without Shaq being able to camp out in the paint, the Lakers won't win a title.

The two games you are referring to were prior to the trades, particularly the Gasol trade.

And who did the Celtics hone their skills against all season in the East? Detroit is it.

Unless a big injury sidelines some starters Lakers win the title.

Doctor X · Post by **Doctor X** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:41 am

Lakers will not make it.

--J.D.

Grammatron · Post by **Grammatron** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:11 pm

Doctor X wrote:Lakers will not make it.

--J.D.

Dude, what's up with Boston?

Evolver · Post by **Evolver** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:20 pm

Grammatron wrote:
Doctor X wrote:Lakers will not make it.

--J.D.
Dude, what's up with Boston?

Dunno,

They played like shit the last 2 games.
If they can't handle a second-rate team like the Hocks, I don't see them going very far.

CHARLEY_BIGTIME · Post by **CHARLEY_BIGTIME** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:32 pm

I'd just like to remind everyone that this is a sub-forum for topics about sport.

etc.

MrMonty · Post by **MrMonty** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:08 pm

Go Cavs!

Wouldn't mind seeing Detroit or Boston lose another game, but I seriously doubt they'll lose their respective series.

Doctor X · Post by **Doctor X** » Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:15 am

Grammatron wrote:
Doctor X wrote:Lakers will not make it.
Dude, what's up with Boston?

I blame Belichick.

--J.D.

Grammatron · Post by **Grammatron** » Sat May 03, 2008 9:02 pm

What a stunner.

Doctor X · Post by **Doctor X** » Sun May 04, 2008 12:23 am

Oddly enough, if they had gone for two rather than three they would have won since Atlanta failed to score.

Get them in Boston.

--J.D.

ck · Post by ck » Fri May 23, 2008 4:33 pm

Well, now that the Celtics have dropped one at home, I really do not think this is such a sure thing.

I was not convinced they were going to beat the Pistons even before last night's game. Now I am even less convinced.

It will be really interesting to see what happens in Detroit--now that they HAVE to win on the road, and they have failed to all post-season so far.

Grammatron · Post by **Grammatron** » Fri May 23, 2008 4:48 pm

ck wrote:Well, now that the Celtics have dropped one at home, I really do not think this is such a sure thing.

I was not convinced they were going to beat the Pistons even before last night's game. Now I am even less convinced.

It will be really interesting to see what happens in Detroit--now that they HAVE to win on the road, and they have failed to all post-season so far.

They have been completely unimpressive in the play offs and have more held on rather than beat the other teams.

It's ok though, I will also accept Lakers vs. Detroit for the finals as a form of pay back.

Doctor X · Post by **Doctor X** » Sat May 24, 2008 2:11 am

Might actually force me to root for Detroit. . . .

--J.D.

Grammatron · Post by **Grammatron** » Sat May 24, 2008 6:01 am

Doctor X wrote:Might actually force me to root for Detroit. . . .

--J.D.

Well you do have a history of rooting for the team that loses the championship game

Doctor X · Post by **Doctor X** » Sat May 24, 2008 6:35 am

Grammatron wrote:
Doctor X wrote:Might actually force me to root for Detroit. . . .
Well you do have a history of rooting for the team that loses the championship game

I have NEVER rooted for the MFYs!!!1!!111!

--J.D.

Grammatron · Post by **Grammatron** » Sat May 24, 2008 8:17 am

Doctor X wrote:
Grammatron wrote:
Doctor X wrote:Might actually force me to root for Detroit. . . .
Well you do have a history of rooting for the team that loses the championship game
I have NEVER rooted for the MFYs!!!1!!111!

--J.D.

Ok you got me there.

DrMatt · Post by **DrMatt** » Sat May 24, 2008 4:39 pm

It's no use.
I win.

Grammatron · Post by **Grammatron** » Fri May 30, 2008 3:49 am

Doctor X wrote:Lakers will not make it.

--J.D.

FAIL!

Doctor X · Post by **Doctor X** » Fri May 30, 2008 6:28 am

Grammatron wrote:
Doctor X wrote:Lakers will not make it.
FAIL!

I am not responsible for Refs not calling fouls that the NBA admits to later.

--J.D.

Grammatron · Post by **Grammatron** » Fri May 30, 2008 4:38 pm

Doctor X wrote:
Grammatron wrote:
Doctor X wrote:Lakers will not make it.
FAIL!
I am not responsible for Refs not calling fouls that the NBA admits to later.

--J.D.

Evasion noted.

izittrue · Post by **izittrue** » Fri May 30, 2008 4:40 pm

Grammatron wrote:Calling it now.

Good call...collect your one MILLION dollars...

Doctor X · Post by **Doctor X** » Sat May 31, 2008 12:05 am

Grammatron wrote:
Doctor X wrote:
Grammatron wrote:
Doctor X wrote:Lakers will not make it.
FAIL!
I am not responsible for Refs not calling fouls that the NBA admits to later.
Evasion noted.

Won't be long now.

jdReport

Evolver · Post by **Evolver** » Sat May 31, 2008 4:16 am

Grammatron wrote:Calling it now.

Good call.

Doctor X · Post by **Doctor X** » Sat May 31, 2008 5:06 am

One thing I hate about NBA is the utterly subjective refereeing--that occurs on both sides. Obviously, the "offensive foul" from a man standing behind the three-point line is, as commentators put it, "the worst call in history!" However, that was not the only one. Fortunately, the Cs shook off the loss of a potential 4 point play . . . much like the Steelers shook off that attempt to give the AFC Championship to Indy.

--J.D.

Evolver · Post by **Evolver** » Fri Jun 06, 2008 2:36 pm

Game 1: Our thug beat your rapist.

Grammatron · Post by **Grammatron** » Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:42 pm

Evolver wrote:Game 1: Our thug beat your rapist.

Great game.

Could've been done without the theatrics.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and add to my prediction: Lakers in 5.

Evolver · Post by **Evolver** » Sun Jun 08, 2008 1:48 am

Grammatron wrote:
Evolver wrote:Game 1: Our thug beat your rapist.

Great game.

Could've been done without the theatrics.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and add to my prediction: Lakers in 5.

I doubt either team will win it in 5. 6 maybe.

Doctor X · Post by **Doctor X** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:03 am

!

--J.D.

Grammatron · Post by **Grammatron** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:16 am

Man Lakers gave 3rd quarter away, the only thing that was missing from it was a gift-wrapping and a bow.

Sure the officiating in the first half was so blatantly one-sided that the referees might as well have been wearing Celtic jerseys, but that's no excuse to go home for fucks sake.

Doctor X · Post by **Doctor X** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 9:39 am

Especially since the Cs gift wrapped it in the first and fourth.

--J.D.

izittrue · Post by **izittrue** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 1:32 pm

Grammatron wrote:
I'm going to go out on a limb here and add to my prediction: Lakers in 5.

Give back your one MILLION dollars.
NBA referee's suck...they favor the home team...
But when it's my home team I don't mind.

Evolver · Post by **Evolver** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:22 am

Man, those Lakers are crybabies even when the refs are giving them all the calls.

And the Celtics would be winning if they could actually find the basket a little.

Grammatron · Post by **Grammatron** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:00 am

Evolver wrote:Man, those Lakers are crybabies even when the refs are giving them all the calls.

And the Celtics would be winning if they could actually find the basket a little.

I was not pleased with the way Lakers were playing, they better kick it up a notch if they want to win 3 more games.

Doctor X · Post by **Doctor X** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:39 am

They seem to be playing perfectly. . . .

--J.D.

Grammatron · Post by **Grammatron** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:55 pm

Doctor X wrote:They seem to be playing perfectly. . . .

--J.D.

Just like KG.

Doctor X · Post by **Doctor X** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:16 pm

That is so last week . . . this week we blame Cassell.

--J.D.

The Skeptical Community

Lakers vs. Celtics

Lakers vs. Celtics

Re: Lakers vs. Celtics

Re: Lakers vs. Celtics