Ken Ham, Satan's MVP

Hot topics in delusion and rationalization.
the_ignored
Posts: 711
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 8:05 am
Location: Right where I'm not supposed to be.

Re: Ken Ham, Satan's MVP

Post by the_ignored »

They may have a point

Part of "doctor" Purdom's attack on Libby:
Either way, she was challenged, fought for a while, and gave up. It’s difficult to say why, but she does seem to have some misunderstandings about Genesis and the Bible despite her exposure to creation apologetics.
Part of Libby's response:
Second, I find the last part of this paragraph a bit insulting. Dr. Purdom doesn’t know me, and she wasn’t there when I was in college. The idea that I “fought for a while” and then “gave up” is ludicrous. I “fought” for months. And it wasn’t a college professor I was “fighting,” either. It was another student in my dorm, a student who found science and evolution fascinating and was himself fairly agnostic. I spent almost an entire year arguing with him about creation and evolution daily, and I continually went back to my sources, reread my books, and made sure I was using every young earth creationist argument in the book. I even took him to an Answers in Genesis conference. That’s not fighting “for a while.”

In the end, I didn’t “give up.” Rather, I realized I had been wrong. There’s a big difference there. And once I saw that creationism didn’t actually hold water, and that evolution was supported by the evidence, I had the intellectual honesty to change my mind. Why? Because that’s what you do when you realize you were wrong.

And that last sentence? After studying at Answers in Genesis’ knees for years, after attending their conferences and reading their literature, after searching the Bible and reading other creationist resources like the Institute for Creation Research and Henry Morris, I simply “misunderstood”? I simply had “exposure”? Dr. Purdom is wrong, very, very wrong.
In other words, Purdom....How do you know that Libby fought only a "while" and "gave up"? Where you there?

No. You weren't.
the_ignored
Posts: 711
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 8:05 am
Location: Right where I'm not supposed to be.

Re: Ken Ham, Satan's MVP

Post by the_ignored »

A response to Ham going off his nut again:
Yet no one is suggesting that we get morality from the animal kingdom. Nye simply argued that homosexuality is natural because it is commonly seen throughout nature. Nye did nothing to argue the morality of homosexuality because, in reality, it is not a moral issue. The only moral issue is consent. Two people are engaging in a consenting relationship, and to argue that it is “unnatural” is dishonest when we have evidence stating otherwise.
So all Ham did again, like with his rant about Cyrus, is show what he'd be like without his god belief.
Doctor X
Posts: 74292
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:09 pm
Title: Collective Messiah
Location: Your Mom

Re: Ken Ham, Satan's MVP

Post by Doctor X »

He would be more of a Cunt?

Is that even possible?

--J.D.
Witness
Posts: 35573
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: Ken Ham, Satan's MVP

Post by Witness »

Abdul Alhazred wrote:The Chabadniks are slicker about it. Not more convincing, just slicker.

God created Adam with a navel and a beard. That is, signs of earlier development. So too the Earth and indeed the Universe have signs of earlier development, etc.

Nothing to do with science of course. But then the Chabadniks aren't trying to "take on" science nor dictate goyische school curricula.
A Victorian tried also:
Wikipedia wrote:Omphalos

In the months following Emily's death, Gosse worked with remarkable diligence on a book that he may have viewed as the most important of his career. Although a failure both financially and intellectually, it is the book by which he is best remembered. Gosse believed that he had discovered a theory that might neatly resolve the seeming contradiction in the age of the earth between the evidence of God's Word and the evidence of His creation as expounded by such contemporary geologists as Charles Lyell. In 1857, two years before the publication of Charles Darwin's, Origin of Species, Gosse published Omphalos: an Attempt to Untie the Geological Knot and thereby created what has been called the Omphalos hypothesis.

In what Stephen Jay Gould has called "glorious purple prose," Gosse argued that if one assumed creation ex nihilo, there would necessarily be traces of previous existence that had never actually occurred. "Omphalos" is Greek for "navel," and Gosse argued that the first man, Adam, did not require a navel because he was never born; nevertheless he must have had one, as do all complete human beings, just as God must have created trees with rings that they never grew. Thus, Gosse argued that the fossil record—even coprolites—might also be evidence of life that had never actually existed but which may have been instantly formed by God at the moment of creation
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... 2C1855.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Henry_Gosse
the_ignored
Posts: 711
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 8:05 am
Location: Right where I'm not supposed to be.

Re: Ken Ham, Satan's MVP

Post by the_ignored »

Here's a similar story to the Libby Anne one.