'Murica

This is our lounge area. Feel free to come in and get acquainted!
User avatar
Giz
Posts: 2432
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 5:07 pm
Location: USA!

Re: 'Murica

Post by Giz » Tue Sep 17, 2019 8:27 pm

Witness wrote:
Tue Sep 17, 2019 7:50 pm
Image
Wait, he set up a store on a reservation and refused to sell to native Americans? What was his business plan?

User avatar
Witness
Posts: 23557
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: 'Murica

Post by Witness » Tue Sep 17, 2019 8:59 pm


User avatar
gnome
Posts: 23106
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 12:40 am
Location: New Port Richey, FL

Re: 'Murica

Post by gnome » Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:34 am

Image
"If fighting is sure to result in victory, then you must fight! Sun Tzu said that, and I'd say he knows a little bit more about fighting than you do, pal, because he invented it, and then he perfected it so that no living man could best him in the ring of honor. Then, he used his fight money to buy two of every animal on earth, and then he herded them onto a boat, and then he beat the crap out of every single one. And from that day forward any time a bunch of animals are together in one place it's called a zoo! (Beat) Unless it's a farm!"
--Soldier, TF2

User avatar
Anaxagoras
Posts: 25455
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan

Re: 'Murica

Post by Anaxagoras » Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:54 am

Andrew J. Myrick (May 28, 1832 – August 18, 1862), was a trader who, with his Dakota wife (Winyangewin/Nancy Myrick), operated stores in southwest Minnesota at two Indian agencies serving the Dakota (referred to as Sioux at the time) near the Minnesota River.

In the summer of 1862, when the Dakota were starving because of failed crops and delayed annuity payments, Myrick is noted as refusing to sell them food on credit, allegedly saying, "Let them eat grass,"[1] although the validity of that alleged quotation has come into dispute.[2]
They left out "on credit". The story is a bit more complicated if you read the whole thing. The part about how he was killed seems to be true though.
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare

User avatar
Witness
Posts: 23557
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: 'Murica

Post by Witness » Fri Sep 20, 2019 12:48 am

From July:
South Dakota will require "In God We Trust" signs in all public schools

A new law in South Dakota now requires all public schools across the state to feature the "In God We Trust" motto on display. Students returning to school this fall will be greeted by the message, which supporters say is meant to "inspire patriotism."

Gov. Kristi Noem signed the law in March, and it went into effect this month. The law requires that the message is prominently displayed in all 149 South Dakota school districts on the first day of classes this year.

[…]

The Freedom From Religion Foundation has condemned the law, calling it part of a "stealth campaign" to inject religion into state legislation. "The motto 'In God We Trust' is inaccurate, exclusionary, and aimed at brainwashing American schoolchildren into believing that our nation is a theocracy," the organization said in a news release Thursday.

The group urged people to contact their legislators to oppose the law. "Our position is that it's a terrible violation of freedom of conscience to inflict a godly message on a captive audience of schoolchildren," co-president Annie Laurie Gaylor said.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/south-dako ... c-schools/

User avatar
Abdul Alhazred
Posts: 78428
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:33 pm
Title: Yes, that one.
Location: Chicago

Re: 'Murica

Post by Abdul Alhazred » Fri Sep 20, 2019 1:02 am

I'm OK with that, as long as the sign makes it unambiguous which God.

Here is my suggested design.

Image
Image "If I turn in a sicko, will I get a reward?"

"Yes! A BIG REWARD!" ====> Click here to turn in a sicko
The arc of the moral universe bends towards chaos.
People who believe God or History are on their side provide the chaos.

User avatar
Witness
Posts: 23557
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: 'Murica

Post by Witness » Fri Sep 20, 2019 1:14 am

↑ Perhaps it should be amended to "In The Only True God™ we trust, for no good reason."

User avatar
Abdul Alhazred
Posts: 78428
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:33 pm
Title: Yes, that one.
Location: Chicago

Re: 'Murica

Post by Abdul Alhazred » Fri Sep 20, 2019 1:18 am

Never heard the catch phrase "almighty dollar"? :)
Image "If I turn in a sicko, will I get a reward?"

"Yes! A BIG REWARD!" ====> Click here to turn in a sicko
The arc of the moral universe bends towards chaos.
People who believe God or History are on their side provide the chaos.

User avatar
Witness
Posts: 23557
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: 'Murica

Post by Witness » Fri Sep 20, 2019 1:28 am

Mamonn! :x

User avatar
Witness
Posts: 23557
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: 'Murica

Post by Witness » Sat Sep 21, 2019 11:44 pm

Amish businessman ordered to pay $5.2M in scam targeting his own community

A man who authorities said took advantage of his Amish heritage to recruit novice investors into a fraudulent scheme has been ordered to pay $5.2 million, most of it to his clients.

Indiana resident Earl Miller’s 72 investors lost more than $4.1 million when his investments failed, according to a complaint from the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2015. He had encouraged people to put their retirement savings into his fund, which he had no experience in managing, by advertising “double digit annual returns” and promising a fixed-rate return of 8 percent to 12 percent per year, investigators said.

Touting his Amish heritage, Miller advertised in Amish newspapers and arranged community meetings with Amish families to attract inexperienced investors, the SEC said.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-fi ... -investors

User avatar
Witness
Posts: 23557
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: 'Murica

Post by Witness » Wed Sep 25, 2019 12:15 am

One in 7 adults in New Orleans has a warrant out for arrest, new data shows

Fifty-two arrestees, outfitted in orange and maroon jumpsuits, await their first appearance before a judge. Most are black. All require a public defender. And more than half of them are here, their hands chained against their stomachs, because they missed a court date for a minor crime, triggering an arrest warrant.

Lauren Anderson, a public defender and attorney supervisor for Municipal Court, is furious as she looks over a list of their names. "It doesn't make any sense," she says. "We're not making the city any safer," she said. "We're only hurting these people, and we just keep doing it over and over. It's infuriating."

There are more than 56,000 outstanding warrants in New Orleans's Municipal Court, dating to 2002, according to city data. A staggering 1 of 7 adults in the country's 50th-largest city have a warrant out for their arrest.

Typically, the crime is failing to appear for scheduled court dates for minor, nonviolent offenses that do not carry a jail sentence, including panhandling and fishing without a license. (Two notable exceptions are battery and domestic abuse, which account for roughly 6 percent of all the warrants.) Anderson characterizes most of them as old nuisance crimes bogging down an already overburdened criminal justice system.

Now, a coalition of elected officials, local civil rights organizations such as Stand With Dignity and the public defender's office is proposing a more permanent solution - wiping out nearly all 56,000 warrants, in addition to any debt accumulated from fines and fees.

If successful, New Orleans would be at the forefront of a growing movement to curb the use of warrants and the threat of arrest when the underlying charge might be little more than public intoxication. Only two cities - Ferguson, Missouri, and San Francisco - and the state of New Jersey have attempted anything similar, according to the Fines and Fees Justice Center in New York.
https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/a ... 462615.php

Nouvelle Orléans? Bad French influence. :mrgreen:

User avatar
Witness
Posts: 23557
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: 'Murica

Post by Witness » Wed Oct 02, 2019 1:54 am


User avatar
Rob Lister
Posts: 21256
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 7:15 pm
Title: Incipient toppler
Location: Swimming in Lake Ed

Re: 'Murica

Post by Rob Lister » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:48 am

That is too sad.

User avatar
Witness
Posts: 23557
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: 'Murica

Post by Witness » Wed Oct 02, 2019 11:28 pm

Image

solely
Posts: 425
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:41 pm

Re: 'Murica

Post by solely » Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:17 am

It's missing a bullseye.

User avatar
Rob Lister
Posts: 21256
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 7:15 pm
Title: Incipient toppler
Location: Swimming in Lake Ed

Re: 'Murica

Post by Rob Lister » Thu Oct 03, 2019 9:19 am

I suppose the first 11x14" is a square.

User avatar
Anaxagoras
Posts: 25455
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan

Re: 'Murica

Post by Anaxagoras » Thu Oct 03, 2019 9:34 am

Not rounded corners like the one in the picture
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare

User avatar
Witness
Posts: 23557
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: 'Murica

Post by Witness » Fri Oct 04, 2019 2:31 am

From 2 years ago (wonder how it fared):
Texas school district to begin paddling as punishment

Image

THREE RIVERS, Texas — School district administrators here are shopping for a couple of paddles.

As part of a new policy that the Three Rivers Independent School District board approved Tuesday, the paddle, likely to be wood, will be used to administer corporal punishment when a student misbehaves at school.

Corporal punishment is defined as the deliberate infliction of physical pain by hitting, paddling, spanking, slapping, or any other physical force used as a means of discipline.

Trustees voted 6-0 on the motion with one member absent. The policy states only a campus’ behavior coordinator or principal can administer the disciplinary measure.
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nati ... 499177001/

User avatar
Witness
Posts: 23557
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: 'Murica

Post by Witness » Sun Oct 06, 2019 1:19 am

Dolphins Are Finally Living and Breeding in the Potomac River Again

About 1,000 bottlenose dolphins have been recorded in the lower reaches of the recovering river, including one that gave birth in August

Image
Dolphins and their calves enjoying a summer day in the lower Potomac River. (Taken under NOAA NMFS Permit No. 19403 (Potomac-Chesapeake Dolphin Project))
When George Washington chose to build his Mount Vernon estate along the Potomac River, he declared the then-pristine body of water “the nation’s river.” At the time, even dolphins were a common sight. In fact, as Karin Bruillard at the Washington Post reports, the porpoises were seen as far upriver as Alexandria, Virginia, in the 1840s.

But by the 1960s, the river that flows through the nation’s capital had lost its luster. Bald eagles—the national bird—struggled for survival on its shores. Dolphins had long since disappeared from its waters. The Potomac became overrun with algae, trash, human waste and pollutants. The nation's river became a “national disgrace,” as President Lyndon Johnson called it at the time.

Now, after almost 50 years of pollution control, clean-up and restoration efforts, researchers have catalogued well over 1,000 bottlenose dolphins living, mating, and even giving birth in the lower reaches of the river.

“People actually forgot that there were dolphins in the river because they hadn’t been seen since the 1880s and because the river was in poor condition, people weren't seeing them,” Melissa Diemand, spokesperson for Potomac Conservancy tells NBC4.

Over the past four years, researchers from Georgetown University’s Potomac-Chesapeake Dolphin Project have been cataloguing dolphins in the lake-like area where the Potomac joins the Chesapeake Bay, reports Bruillard for the Post. In 2015, they counted only 200 individuals. Now, population has reached more than 1,000 individuals in the area, with several small groups of 200 dolphins hanging out in the river. Some have even swam upstream within 50 miles of Washington, D.C.

But the most exciting development came in August, when researchers witnessed a dolphin giving birth in the river. It was one of only three times scientists have seen a bottlenose dolphin giving birth in the wild anywhere, reports Briullard.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-ne ... 180973263/

Who needs dolphins? Time to reverse all these costly clean water, air and whatnot regulations!

User avatar
Witness
Posts: 23557
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: 'Murica

Post by Witness » Tue Oct 15, 2019 1:00 am

Secret Court: FBI Warrantless Searches Were Illegal

A year ago, the U.S.’ surveillance court ruled that the FBI violated Americans’ privacy by broadly sifting through dragnets of intercepted communications.

Some of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s warrantless searches through the National Security Agency’s enormous troves of communications data violated the law and the Constitution, according to secret surveillance court rulings partially declassified on Tuesday.

The bureau’s so-called backdoor searches, long regarded by civil libertarians as a government end-run around warrant requirements, were overly broad, the court found. They appear to have affected what a judge on the court called “a large number of individuals, including U.S. persons.” On one day in December 2017 alone, the court found, the FBI conducted 6,800 queries of the NSA databases using Social Security numbers. The government, in secret, conceded that there were “fundamental misunderstandings” among some FBI personnel over the standards necessary for the searches.

The redacted ruling was kept secret for a year. It represented the latest legal battle over the scope of post-9/11 mass surveillance that affects American freedoms in the name of counterterrorism. It was one of several secret court documents released Tuesday by the ODNI.

Judge James Boasberg of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Court found last October that elements of FBI procedures for querying the databases and then purging irrelevant results–a mechanism to protect Americans’ privacy–“inconsistent with statutory minimization requirements and the requirements of the Fourth Amendment,” which protects Americans against unreasonable searches.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/secret-co ... itter_page